![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
HISTORY OF INVERSION
Dr. Martin had a "marketable personality." He was devoted to communicating the benefits of postural exchange including inversion, and the public responded well to his sincerity and honesty. Dr. Martin appeared on talk shows, and was featured in popular publications like The Wall Street Journal.
Success comes with a price, however. Before long, over forty manufacturers were producing inversion products. There was little differentiation between the products, which caused price wars among the companies. Some manufactures sacrificed quality so that they could offer cheaper products. The lack of attention to quality resulted in product failures, causing serious, sometimes deadly, harm to consumers. Also, a medical study published in 1983 by Dr. Goldman and colleagues showed that inverted patients experienced an increase in blood pressure and internal eye pressure. The media widely reported the study, warning that stroke was a potential result of inversion. Two years following the inversion study, Dr. Goldman reversed his original position, stating, "New research shows that you are at no more of a stroke risk hanging upside down than if you are exercising right side up." More in-depth research found that the body actually has mechanisms that prevent damage from hanging upside down. In fact, while oscillating (inverting with movement), some of the patients' blood pressure actually dropped a few points. Experienced inverters also showed slower heart rates while inverted than when upright. (*Note: these studies were based on patients in generally good health. Make sure you review contraindications prior to inverting.) Dr. Goldman stated that the warnings to the public about the dangers of inversion were "grossly inflated" and that in the 15 years these devices have been in use, there has not been one single stroke or cardiovascular incident documented. Note from TeeterTM: After 37 years, to the best of our knowledge this statement still remains valid. Other universities, including Marquette, Iowa, and Portland studied inversion during this time, with results that vindicated Inversion as no more dangerous than other common fitness activities. Unfortunately, the damage had already been done. The poor quality equipment combined with misunderstandings of health risks resulted in a decline of consumer confidence in inversion products. Inversion went from a multi-million dollar market to one that struggled to survive. The use of Inversion therapy shrank to virtually exclusive use by a few "in the know", including chiropractors, physical therapists, sports trainers and professional athletes. Of the forty plus manufacturers in business in the early 1980's, the Teeter Hang Ups® brand by STL International, Inc. was the only to continuously promote inversion products to present. After a number of years fighting to rebuild the reputation of Inversion therapy, STL has witnessed tremendous growth in the use of inversion products in the late nineties. Inversion fits well with the "whole body wellness" trend that has evolved in the U.S. recently, and has become widely recognized as an effective and viable form of natural therapy. The wide-ranging benefits of Inversion apply to all age ranges and fitness levels.
At the start of the new millennium, STL made the decision to introduce commercial grade equipment to the inversion product mix so that physically active people - those who work out on a regular basis - have the opportunity to introduce inversion into their fitness regimen. We've spent the last several years developing a line of commercial equipment featuring the most durable, highest quality components and materials, maximizing both form and function. Finally, gyms and fitness facilities can offer their members quality, easy-to-use equipment from which to invert - before, during or after their workout! Copyright 2003 STL International Inc. All rights reserved. Web site by Blue Cat Design. |